|
Author's Rating:
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
By: jetbluefan1,
Jun 21, 2003
Pros: superb picture quality at 4.0 megapixels, easy to use, small and stylish
Cons: none...except that it's expensive, but it's worth the money
Bottom Line: The Canon S400 is an excellent digital camera -- bottom line.
|
|
|
Author's Rating:
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
By: zlmajors,
Jun 21, 2003
Pros: Small size, very attractive, durable construction, 4 megapixels, 3x zoom.
Cons: Price, flash, is just a point a shoot.
Bottom Line: My opinion the best digital point and shoot camera on the market. Sexy design, proven reliability, made by a good company. Will even improve your "coolness" ratio.
|
|
|
Author's Rating:
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
By: g_dubya,
Jun 20, 2003
Pros: sharp pictures, great prints, easy to use, compact size
Cons: digital camera learning curve, not as straightforward as film
Bottom Line: Best compact point and shoot digital camera available today. Finally a possible digital replacement for film!
|
|
|
Author's Rating:
|
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
|
By: LaFeet,
May 14, 2003
Pros: resolution, tonal balance, 4 megapixels, 3X zoom, internal processing controls, excellent build quality
Cons: underexposed flash shots, AF assist lamp does not produce better results, small mode dial
Bottom Line: With a faster than most startup time, responsive feeling, good auto focus, small size and 4 megapixel shot size, the S400 is an excellent buy without the other features.
|
|
|
Author's Rating:
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
By: irinette,
Apr 20, 2005
Pros: great quality, good resolution, better than average red-eye
Cons: small LCD, old CF memory, small resolution video, bad battery
Bottom Line: Great shots with sturdy camera!
|
|
|
Author's Rating:
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
By: philly_rich,
Nov 10, 2004
Pros: Size, appearance, picture quality, ergonomics.
Cons: Tiny flash.
Bottom Line: A small, convenient camera that produces excellent quality pictures.
|
|
|
Author's Rating:
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
By: holeydonut2k3,
Aug 26, 2003
Pros: Great daily camera. It goes almost anywhere and takes great photos
Cons: Slightly ineffective macro mode. Rather pricey.
Bottom Line: You will not be disappointed if you use the S400 to take pictures of your daily activities or vacations.
|
|
|
Author's Rating:
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
By: pgray007,
Jul 8, 2003
Pros: Great image quality, pocketability, canon quality
Cons: Somewhat slow focus times, price
Bottom Line: For great image quality, robust build quality, quick startup times and bullet-proof automatic settings, you really can't go wrong.
|
|
|
Author's Rating:
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
By: perrin110,
Aug 4, 2004
Pros: Solid picture quality; handy size; unparalleled ease of use.
Cons: Red eye is an issue when the camera automatically selects the flash mode.
Bottom Line: The best snapshot camera on the market today, even without considering the tiny size.
|
|
|
Author's Rating:
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
By: kuehrig,
Jun 9, 2003
Pros: size, power, functions, ease of use
Cons: point and shoot only
Bottom Line: Better than higher quality cameras I have used including Nikon 5000 and Olympus Camedia SLRs. This is the king of point and shoots until someone can topple it.
|
|
