|
Epson Stylus Photo® 925 InkJet PrinterEpson launched the powerful Epson Stylus Photo 925 ink jet printer, fulfilling the needs of the rising population of digital photo lovers....
Read More
Epson launched the powerful Epson Stylus Photo 925 ink jet printer, fulfilling the needs of the rising population of digital photo lovers. The new model is compatible with many types of memory cards in the market, enabling standalone printing without connecting to the computer. With the innovative automatic roll paper cutter (auto-cutter) and various improvements in printing technology, Epson Stylus Photo 925 makes photo printing an easy task and is the ultimate choice for all quality-seeking users.??Thanks to the standalone function of Photo 925 and its compatibility with different types of memory cards, users can produce high quality photos without connecting to the computer. Photo 925 comes with 3 card slots, enabling direct data reading from Compact flash, Microdrive, SmartMedia and Memory Stick without using any PCMCIA adapter, while SD Card users can print using USB card reader. No matter what type of digital camera you are using, Photo 925 is definitely an optimal choice for...
Minimize
|
|
Review Summary
|
35 Reviews from Epinions.com and Shopping.com
|
| Overall Rating: |
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Paper Handling: |
|
| Author's Rating: |
|
Pros: Easy to use, outrageous photos on premium glassy paper
Cons: a little pricey
Bottom Line:
I highly recommend this printer for print quality and ease of use. Read More
| Author's Rating: |
|
Pros: Exceptional print quality. Images match exactly what I saw on my camera.
Cons: It's slow and horizontal bands result when attempting to print from Photoshop.
Bottom Line:
I would strongly recommend this printer for anyone who wants the highest possible print quality for under $400. Read More
| Author's Rating: |
|
Pros: Endless possibilities, great quality and very convenient.
Cons: None.
| Author's Rating: |
|
| Author's Rating: |
|
| Author's Rating: |
|
| Author's Rating: |
|
| Author's Rating: |
|
| Author's Rating: |
|
| Author's Rating: |
|